Supreme Court weighs Trump administration’s third bid to enforce USPS mail-ballot rule as states file opposition
A First Circuit panel on Sept. 10 declined to let USPS enforce its new mail-ballot approval rule, leaving Judge Indira Talwani's Sept. 4 injunction in place. The Trump DOJ's emergency application — its third bid in the mail-voting fight — is now before Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, the circuit justice, with the full Court expected to decide before ballots are mailed. The rule would require states to get advance USPS approval of ballot envelopes.
Limited coverage: only 2 of 3+ perspectives covered this story in the last 72h.
Read the 2 perspectives
A 22-state coalition and civic groups call the rule an unconstitutional, last-minute bid to disenfranchise mail voters.
SCOTUSblog reported that California-led states, DC and groups including the League of Women Voters and ACLU urged the Court on Sept 9 to leave the injunction intact, arguing the rule usurps state election authority and would cause mid-election chaos.
The dispute is back at the Supreme Court with the injunction still in force and a decision pending.
Spectrum News reported the appeal pending before the Supreme Court, with mail voting proceeding normally while the justices deliberate on a compressed pre-election timeline.